![\"one\"](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/one.jpg\")
Adam Sparks, One of a Kind: The Relationship between Old and New Covenants as the Hermeneutical Key for Christian Theology of Religions <\/i>(Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick, 2010), 325 pages, ISBN 9781606083451.<\/b><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Adam Sparks, One of a Kind: The Relationship between Old and New Covenants as the Hermeneutical Key for Christian Theology of Religions <\/i>(Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick, 2010), 325 pages, ISBN 9781606083451.<\/b><\/p>\n
In this book Reformed theologian Adam Sparks attempts to contribute to the theology of religions conversation by offering a critique of some of the most popular approaches within this discipline. Unlike other projects that focus upon soteriology, this author limits his conversation to the relationship between the old and new covenants as it is treated by inclusivist models. In short, inclusivism maintains that people of faith traditions outside of Christianity may experience salvation by being included in the saving work of Christ. Ultimately, this means that it is not always necessary for an individual to be within the Christian faith in order to be a part of God\u2019s redemptive activity. A Hindu, for example, may experience salvation, if God chooses to do so. The Hindu faith is not redemptive, rather it is God\u2019s work within or despite his religious background that saves. There are many different nuances of the inclusivist position, and Sparks points out that many inclusivists affirm the fulfillment model. The fulfillment model maintains that Christ \u201cfills out\u201d non-Christian religions where they fall short. In other words, where other religions are incomplete, Christ fills in the gaps. Many inclusivist theologians apply the fulfillment model to the relationship between the old and new covenants. Just as Christ\u2019s new covenant is the fulfillment of the old covenant, analogously, Christ must also be the fulfillment of all other religions. Christ not only completes the Jewish faith, but he is the capstone for all non-Christian religions. However, Sparks disagrees. He states \u201c[T]he Israel analogy and fulfillment model have failed to comprehend the organic, progressive nature of this salvation history\u2026.[F]urther\u2026the Israel analogy and fulfillment model undermine the significance of the Christ-event in salvation history by failing to appreciate the decisive effect of this event on history and the nature of existence\u201d, and it is this point that motivates Sparks\u2019 objective (xxiv).<\/p>\n
Overall, Sparks work is an interesting and worthwhile read for those who are new to theology of religions or those who are actively involved within the discussion. The author raises some serious issues that deserve attention, but the question remains whether or not the reader will find Sparks\u2019 argument convincing. He leaves a number of problematic issues unresolved. For example, Sparks suggests that one can find types within other religions while simultaneously maintaining that God is not active within other religions. He concludes that these are elements of original monotheism, however, this is a theory based upon Wilhelm Schidmt\u2019s outdated thesis. Most scholars of religion reject Schmidt\u2019s speculation because there is no means to validate the beliefs of primitive religions (282). Regardless, this work provides the reader with sound research that spans theology of religions from the early Church to the contemporary scene. Parenthetically, many of the readers of The Pneuma Review <\/i>may notice that Sparks\u2019 interaction with Pentecostal scholars is limited. While he cites Veli-Matti K\u00e4rkk\u00e4inen on several occasions, his engagement with Amos Yong is absent. Sparks\u2019 approach is noticeably christocentric, and one is left wondering how he would interact to Yong\u2019s pneumatological approach to theology of religions.<\/p>\n
Reviewed by David Bradnick<\/i><\/p>\n