{"id":22625,"date":"2017-11-03T09:02:23","date_gmt":"2017-11-03T09:02:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/daniel-castelo-pentecostalism-as-a-christian-mystical-tradition\/"},"modified":"2017-11-03T09:02:23","modified_gmt":"2017-11-03T09:02:23","slug":"daniel-castelo-pentecostalism-as-a-christian-mystical-tradition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/daniel-castelo-pentecostalism-as-a-christian-mystical-tradition\/","title":{"rendered":"Daniel Castelo: Pentecostalism as a Christian Mystical Tradition"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Daniel Castelo, Pentecostalism as a Christian Mystical Tradition<\/a><\/em> (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2017), 194 + xx pages, ISBN 9780802869562.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In this book, Daniel Castelo\u2019s main goal is to show how Pentecostalism \u201cis decisively not<\/em> a Protestant tradition generally\u201d and \u201cnot<\/em> part of contemporary evangelicalism particularly\u201d (p. xiii). He moreover argues that pentecostal identity, spiritualty, and theological development are diminished when these foci are largely subsumed under Evangelicalism (p. xiv). He thus suggests that Pentecostalism \u201cis best framed as a modern instantiation of the mystical stream of Christianity\u201d (pp. xv-vi). Hence, \u201cPentecostalism is best understood as a mystical tradition of the church catholic<\/em>\u201d (p. xvi). Castelo thus argues that rather than immediately looking to contemporary Evangelicalism, Pentecostals can find far more congruent resources for articulating their identity, spirituality, and theology, in the historical Christian mystical tradition. In the Postscript, Castelo well summarises his purpose for this book: \u201cIts aim has been to facilitate a theological exercise of rethinking Pentecostalism in light of mystical categories for the sake of deepening the connections of this movement within wider Christianity and also as a way of differentiating it from forms of reasoning typically associated with American evangelicalism\u201d (p. 177).<\/p>\n

\"\"
Daniel Castelo<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Besides the Introduction and Postscript, the book comprises five chapters. By framing the book\u2019s thrust \u201cwithin the domains of theological method and epistemology\u201d (p. 1), in Chapter One (\u201cThe Challenge of Method\u201d) Castelo substantiates his aims by demonstrating their resonance with past and ongoing pentecostal scholarship that has conceived Pentecostalism as a \u201cspirituality\u201d (pp. 1-6). Castelo devotes Chapter Two (\u201cA Mystical Tradition?\u201d) to identifying thematic aspects of the historic Christian mystical tradition which he believes are most congruent to pentecostal experience and spirituality. Here he argues that convergence can be seen between the pentecostal stress on \u201cencountering God\u201d as the aim of their liturgical practices (pp. 80-83) and the historic mystical stress on movement towards \u201cunion\u201d with God (pp. 44, 55-57, 80-82). In Chapter 3 (\u201cThe Epistemological Form of Evangelical Theology\u201d), Castelo argues the incongruence of contemporary Evangelicalism\u2019s theological methodological approaches as a ready resource for pentecostal theological method, insofar that Evangelicalism continues its epistemological embedding within its fundamentalist-foundationalist heritage (p. 125).<\/p>\n

\u201cPentecostalism is best understood as a mystical tradition.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/div>In chapter 4 (\u201cExpanding the Pentecostal Understanding of Spirit-Baptism\u201d), Castelo further explores how pentecostal experience and contemporary theological developments demonstrate deep resonance with historical mystical themes, and hence, how the mystical tradition provides Pentecostals conceptual and theological categories for best articulating their spirituality, particularly in relation to their understanding and experience of Spirit baptism (pp. 126-129). Finally, in Chapter 5 (\u201cThe Spirit-Baptized Life\u201d) Castelo brings current pentecostal scholarship into conversation with notable figures representing the ancient mystical tradition. He does this to suggest practical ways on how retrieving Christian mystical themes can address common problems in Pentecostalism and also best express genuine pentecostal themes (p. 158).<\/p>\n

It should be seen that in many ways, Castelo\u2019s functions as a follow-up to themes and aims earlier pursued by Simon Chan in his book, Pentecostal Theology and the Christian Spiritual Tradition<\/em> (Sheffield, 2000). Castelo in fact devotes a section to Chan\u2019s earlier work (pp. 154-157). What primarily differentiates Castelo\u2019s book from Chan\u2019s earlier work however, is the greater analytical depth he gives towards explicating incongruence between pentecostal and contemporary evangelical (particularly North American) epistemological and theological-methodologies. Unfortunately, on this topic (chapter 3), his argumentation is quite dense and seemingly over repetitive.<\/p>\n

Pentecostals are more than merely Evangelicals who speak in tongues.<\/em><\/strong><\/div>I should provide some critique on how Castelo primarily nuances the negative (apophatic) theological themes of the Christian mystical tradition. Negative theology stresses human cognitive and linguistic limitations towards theological articulation. Granted, as Castelo argues, there are facets of negative theology very applicable towards expressing pentecostal spirituality, especially with reference to tongues-speech, and the trans-rational orientation of pentecostal spirituality. But I feel that the negative theology themes that Castelo has stressed, moves too far towards abstract, non-embodied reflection, which is precisely one of the things that makes the practice of theological reflection ill-fitted for many non-scholarly Pentecostals. He could have rectified this simply by more substantially surveying other aspects of the Christian mystical tradition, which I believe would provide a far better resonance with grassroots Pentecostals, thus better establishing the congruence between the two traditions. These would include bridal mysticism motifs, the missiological notions of mystical \u201cunion\u201d language, and recent ecumenical work towards establishing the broader presence of \u201cunion\u201d (\u201cin Christ\u201d) theology themes (a major theme in the mystical tradition) across Christian traditions, including Pentecostalism. To Castelo\u2019s credit, he does suggest that the Three Ways narrative of the salvation journey (purgative, illuminative, and unitive ways) is a helpful scheme for articulating pentecostal notions of life formation (pp. 77-82). Finally, also helpful would be to ground the term “mystical,” as some approaches do, to the New Testament term “mystery,” thereby strengthening the missiological meaning to Christian mysticism.<\/p>\n

Does abstract theological reflection fit pentecostalism? Does the Christian mystical tradition fit better?<\/em><\/strong><\/div>Fortunately, the argumentative density I earlier alluded to, gives way to a very pleasant read in the last two chapters. Castelo\u2019s final chapter (\u201cThe Spirit-Baptized Life\u201d) helpfully suggests practical ways on how retrieving Christian mystical themes can address problems commonly identified with pentecostal spirituality, and conversely, better clarify those features of pentecostal spiritualty at its best. In all this, Castelo approaches the pentecostal chief metaphor of Spirit baptism not just as a one-time event, but better, as a category descriptive of the whole Christian life and journey. He then outlines how three Christian mystical themes would negotiate these aims: 1. Christian salvation as an upward ascending journey towards union with God (\u201cSweet Journey from Glory to Glory\u201d); 2. Acknowledging seasons of adversity\/\u201dexperiences of defeat\u201d\/desolation as divinely structured into the upward ascent towards union (\u201cSteadfastness in the Midst of Spiritual Aridity\u201d); and 3. Recognising that not everything in this upward ascent can or even should be readily understood (\u201cIgnorance as a Dynamic of Grace\u201d).<\/p>\n

Spirit baptism is not just as a one-time event, and is better understood as a description of the whole Christian life and journey.<\/em><\/strong><\/div>Notwithstanding the concerns I have raised, I therefore highly commend Castelo\u2019s work as a valuable help towards demonstrating the ecumenical roots and resonance of pentecostal spirituality with the broader Church Catholic, rather than simply as \u201cEvangelicals who speak in tongues.\u201d He moreover provides practical suggestions towards retrieving historical mystical themes for better articulating pentecostal experience. Hence, Castelo provides apt warrant to fellow Pentecostals, to look beyond North American Evangelicalism for understanding who they are, and how they may best express their spirituality as a unique Christian tradition. More specifically, Castelo\u2019s work should encourage Pentecostals to look towards Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, and Anglicism for apt theological resources. For we can and should do so, insofar as these traditions provide us open doorways into the historic Christian mystical tradition that in so many ways, better mirrors our pentecostal experience and spirituality.<\/p>\n

Reviewed by Monte Lee Rice<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Publisher\u2019s page: https:\/\/www.eerdmans.com\/Products\/6956\/pentecostalism-as-a-christian-mystical-tradition.aspx<\/a><\/p>\n

Preview: https:\/\/books.google.com\/books\/about\/Pentecostalism_as_a_Christian_Mystical_T.html?id=C0UkDwAAQBAJ<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Daniel Castelo, Pentecostalism as a Christian Mystical Tradition (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2017), 194 + xx pages, ISBN 9780802869562. In this book, Daniel Castelo\u2019s main goal is to show how Pentecostalism \u201cis decisively not a Protestant tradition generally\u201d and \u201cnot part of contemporary evangelicalism particularly\u201d (p. xiii). He moreover argues that…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2867,"featured_media":22626,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3017,17],"tags":[3076,2700,2813,3077,2678,2854],"ppma_author":[4675],"class_list":["post-22625","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fall-2017","category-indepth","tag-castelo","tag-christian","tag-daniel","tag-mystical","tag-pentecostalism","tag-tradition","author-montelrice"],"authors":[{"term_id":4675,"user_id":2867,"is_guest":0,"slug":"montelrice","display_name":"Monte Rice","avatar_url":{"url":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/MonteRice201512-187x187-150x150.jpg","url2x":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/MonteRice201512-187x187-150x150.jpg"},"0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22625","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2867"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22625"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22625\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22626"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22625"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22625"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22625"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/km7.a6a.mytemp.website\/journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=22625"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}