Cheleb: The Finest

Seeing grace and mercy in the Old Testament story of Cain and Abel.

 

“For I am the Lord, I change not” (Malachi 3:6).

God has changed. Or at least that seems to be what many are teaching in our day. There are denominations that teach that the God of the Old Testament is different from the God of the New Testament holding that the old God was mean and wrathful, but the new God is loving and full of mercy. One theory goes so far as to state that God has matured from a juvenile attitude to having a more adult disposition.

Image: Wikimedia Commons

It is certainly true that God demonstrates awesome power in the Old Testament. Yet it’s fair to say what happened in ancient days will be mild compared to what He is going to do in the end of days, when the wrath of God is poured out and entire segments of the world’s population will cease to exist! This demonstrates either a God who cannot make up his mind, or a changeless God of perfect continuity.

I will assume that if you are reading the Pneuma Review, you agree with Scripture that God is changeless. This conjecture being true, then the grace, mercy, and compassion “others” claim are absent from in the Old Testament must, in fact, be there. Such is the case in the story of Cain and Abel.

“And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord (Gen.. 4:2).” This sounds reasonable. It even sounds like Cain had a good head on his shoulders to have decided to bring an offering to the Creator.

Yet the key to understanding the sibling rivalry between Cain and Abel is found in the next verse.

And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and the fat thereof. And the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering.

The Hebrew word for offering is minchah. It is not merely any offering, but a specific offering. This comes to a fuller understanding in the tabernacle period, but there are elements we can appreciate in Cain and Abel’s offering (See Pneuma Review Vol 2 No 2 Spring 1999 for more explanation on this and all the Levitical sacrifices).

Whatever acts of justice God did in ancient days are going to seem mild compared the wrath that will be poured out in the last days.
Specifically, the minchah offering was a voluntary sacrifice made as a tribute to God from the deep convictions of one’s heart. In the tabernacle period it was grain, specifically unleavened loaves of bread, anointed with olive oil.

Cain’s offering—also called minchah in our text—was a perfectly acceptable “form” of sacrifice. There is no apparent deliberation on God’s part as to whether Abel’s lamb was more acceptable—or more appropriate—than fruit. To make such a distinction on our part is to say that Abel’s works were better than Cain’s, and we know that people are justified not by works, but rather by faith.1

So what was the problem?

We also read of Abel’s offering that it was “the firstlings of his flock and the fat thereof” The firstlings also point to later days, when God would require the firstborn of every womb,2 but it also points to a Firstfruits offering3—a tithe if you will.

Able made his offering … based on the purest and most humanly natural motive for any sacrifice: thankfulness. It was to thank God for His infinite goodness and kindness that Abel chose the firstlings of his flock and the choicest parts thereof. He put his heart into giving the offering.
Likewise the Word tells us that it was the “fat thereof.” The Hebrew for “fat” is cheleb. It certainly can be translated as fat (which will belong only to God in the Tabernacle period—a soothing aroma),4 but it is equally translated as “best, finest, or choicest.” The best and finest becomes part of the later sacrificial system also, that no blemish or fault could be found on the animal being given to the Almighty.

We therefore see a remarkable picture of Yeshua in Abel’s offering. The sacrifice was voluntary, the Firstfruit, and the best—without spot or blemish.

“Able made his offering … based on the purest and most humanly natural motive for any sacrifice: thankfulness. It was to thank God for His infinite goodness and kindness that Abel chose the firstlings of his flock and the choicest parts thereof. He put his heart into giving the offering. He desired to make it of exceptional quality. [Rabbi] Ramam points out that this example should serve as a model for all who wish to offer a sacrifice to God.”5

One of the most important lessons for us in Abel’s sacrifice is that he was expressing sacrificial love. He was willing to give his first and finest to the Almighty. His sacrifice was accepted not because of its components or ritual, not on the basis of works, but because of the condition of Abel’s heart. It is in this regard that the Old Testament reminds us, “The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise.”6

But for Cain and for his offering He had no regard. So Cain became very angry and his countenance fell (Gen. 4:5).

Cain was merely going through the motions without the deep conviction, without the broken spirit, or contrite heart.
Most English translations render chara as “angry,” but it can very appropriately be translated as “depressed.” We do not find in Cain’s offering the same zeal that we do in Abel’s. In fact, we could say that Cain was merely going through the motions without the deep conviction, without the broken spirit, or contrite heart.

When one “goes through the motions,” there is a lack of satisfaction. Whether we are talking about work, about family life, about church life, or about pastoring a congregation; if your heart is not in it, there is no satisfaction to be derived.

“You want to be in a pity-party?” God says to Cain, “So be it. Your life will be pitiful.”
Without satisfaction it is easier for the Adversary to plant “ill” thoughts and imaginations that lead to depression, anger, and eventually sin. Our interests become less focused on others and become increasingly internalized.

Depressed people find themselves saying things like, “If only …,” or “Why doesn’t anyone ever …?” or the granddaddy of them all, “No one cares about me or my needs.” This frame of mind can become spiritually cannibalistic, making everything seem distant and meaningless because “I’m” not being ministered to.

If Cain was simply going through the motions, lacked satisfaction, and saw Abel’s successes, he may very well have slumped into a self-centered depression.

Now you or I would probably load accolades on Abel, the nice boy, the good boy, and might leave Cain to his own devises. But this is not what God does. The changeless God of compassion reaches out to Cain.

Then the Lord said to Cain, “Why are you angry? And why has your countenance fallen?” (Gen. 4:6).

Does this sound like the voice of an Old Testament, wrathful God? Rather, it sounds like a concerned brother or father. He sees Cain’s depression (Why has your countenance fallen?), and the resulting anger.

The best and finest … no blemish or fault could be found on the animal being given to the Almighty.
But Cain is too self-absorbed. He doesn’t even see the great honor being bestowed upon him. There is no record of God talking with Abel the righteous, but God does talk to Cain the unrighteous. While God had no respect for Cain’s offering—the man in sin—he deeply cared about him.

As Cain had sown, now he would reap. By his own bad attitude, his offering received no respect, and his darkened mind does not receive or respect God’s offering of omniscient advice—even though the Almighty is reaching out to him.

If you do well, will not your countenance be lifted up? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door; and its desire is for you, but you must master it (Gen. 4:7).

The Creator offers wisdom from on High. “Try harder, apply yourself,” is the advice. In other words, “If you give it your best, you can beat the depression. Give up the ‘what does it matter?’ attitude and get over your pity party. If you settle for second-best, sin will overcome you.”

God’s desire is to heal Cain and to help him master sin. He is telling Cain he is sinning—even though no biblical definition of sin exists yet. Cain apparently has an inborn knowledge of sin and even though not worthy, God is wooing him, calling him back into fellowship and relationship. This is a God of compassion.

Cain told Abel his brother. And it came about when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother and killed him (Gen. 4:8).

There is no record of God talking with Abel the righteous, but God does talk to Cain the unrighteous.
We don’t know what Cain told Abel. The Scripture doesn’t give us any insight to the conversation. Cain may have talked about his conversation with God. They may have discussed the weather. Or Cain may have told Abel off. We simply don’t know. Yet here is the great paradox: Abel, whose offering was favored, is dead. It sounds like the age-old question, “Why do the wicked prosper?” “Why has the way of the wicked prospered? Why are all those who deal in treachery at ease?” (Jer 12:1).

Then the Lord said to Cain, “Where is Abel your brother?” And he said, “I do not know. Am I my brother’s keeper?” (Gen. 4:9).

Again, God speaks with Cain. You or I might be on our faces, trembling with fear of retribution, but Cain still seems to be totally self-absorbed.

The Most High never asks a question for His benefit. Rather, He tries to get people to think before they answer. The merciful Judge was giving Cain an opportunity to repent. God knew a murder had taken place. He knew that Cain was guilty and deserving of capital punishment, yet our God of compassion was offering him one more chance to change.

If you give it your best, you can beat the depression. Give up the “what does it matter?” attitude and get over your pity party. If you settle for second-best, sin will overcome you.
In Genesis 4:10-12 God says, “What have you done? The voice of your brother’s blood is crying to Me from the ground. Now you are cursed from the ground, which has opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood from your hand. When you cultivate the ground, it will no longer yield its strength to you; you will be a vagrant and a wanderer on the earth.”

As already mentioned, Cain was deserving of capital punishment, yet this Old Testament God grants Cain unmerited mercy. God had cursed the ground when Adam and Eve were exiled from the Garden of Eden, now that ground curses Cain, the consequences of his sin. Even with mercy come consequences.

You or I might have said, “Enough!” and thrown Cain out. This is not what God did. Rather, He affirms his love and provision for Cain.
Here we see a judgment that fits the crime. God recognized Cain’s self-absorbed behavior, what we might call a pity-party in the modern vernacular. “You want to be in a pity-party?” He says, “So be it. Your life will be pitiful.”

At this point, a man of good conscience should be on his face pleading for forgiveness and escape from the pronouncement. But not Cain.

Cain said to the Lord, “My punishment is too great to bear! Behold, You have driven me this day from the face of the ground; and from Your face I will be hidden, and I will be a vagrant and a wanderer on the earth, and whoever finds me will kill me” (Gen. 4:13).

When one goes through the motions, there is a lack of satisfaction. Whether we are talking about work, about family life, about church life, or about pastoring a congregation; if your heart is not in it, there is no satisfaction to be derived.
Cain the Selfish can still only think of himself and is, in essence, calling God “mean.” Cain seems ignorant of all the Lord has tried to do on his behalf. The Most High desired intimate worship, warned Cain when he was out of step, and even now—though Cain deserves death—is attempting to discipline him into repentance. But Cain is deaf and blind, depraved to these truths. Are we so different?

Cain understood the depths of his crime, though he still did not admit having perpetrated it. At no point did the merciful God say He was going to hide his face from him. Yet Cain knew that is what he deserved. At no point did God say that anyone else was going to be allowed to kill him, yet Cain’s depression and self-centeredness was fast becoming paranoia! Truly, as God had lovingly warned Cain, sin was no longer crouching, but had deceived and taken him.

You or I might have said, “Enough!” and thrown Cain out. This is not what God did. Rather, He affirms his love and provision for Cain:

So the Lord said to him, “Therefore whoever kills Cain, vengeance will be taken on him sevenfold.” And the Lord appointed a sign for Cain, so that no one finding him would slay him (Gen. 4:15).

Despite modern detractors, that the God of the Old Testament is wrathful and mean, God does not respond to Cain spitefully or wrathfully. He responds with a grace gift.

Cain apparently has an inborn knowledge of sin and even though not worthy, God is wooing him, calling him back into fellowship and relationship. This is a God of compassion.
What can we learn from Cain and Abel? Our God is a God of compassion and mercy, desiring fellowship, and will go to great lengths to restore that fellowship, even among unrighteous sinners. We learn that our second best, in any endeavor, does not bring satisfaction. We cannot bring God our leftovers and expect that we will find satisfaction. He is pleased only by our faith-response, because our efforts never amounted to anything anyway. There are also plain lessons showing that self-centeredness leads to sin and destruction. And above all, we have this promise of God: though sin’s desire is for us, with the help of the sacrifice made for us, Yeshua our Savior, we can master it!

 

PR 

 

Notes

1 Romans 3:28

2 Exodus 34:19

3 ref. Leviticus 23:10

4 Exodus 29:13 , 29:22, Lev 1:8, 1:12, 1:16, 3:3, 3:4, etc.

5 The Call of Torah, Bereshit, ArtScroll Tanakh Series, p. 65, brackets mine.

6 Psalm 51:17

All Scriptures are taken from the New American Standard Bible unless otherwise noted. © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977 by the Lockman Foundation. Used by permission.

Scripture quotations marked (NKJV) are from The New King James Version. © 1979, 1980, 1982 Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *