What Women Want: Pentecostal Women Ministers Speak For Themselves

Kimberly Ervin Alexander and James P. Bowers, What Women Want: Pentecostal Women Ministers Speak For Themselves (Lanham, MD: Seymour Press, 2013), 166 pages.

The Church of God (Cleveland, TN) is one of the major Pentecostal bodies in the United States. This book contains the results of a study conducted in that denomination regarding women and ministry. Some books that deal with this subject focus on biblical texts to either support or limit women’s place in ministry, this book, however, asks women ministers what they want. Not surprisingly, what they want is equality in ministry. The Church of God has 3,088 licensed women ministers in the United States, 726 of them participated in this survey (page 29). Those who made up this sample group are from different age groups and ethnic groups (page 13). The respondents come from different parts of the country (pages 30-31) and have varying degrees of education (page 55). One thousand randomly chosen male ministers in the denomination, called Ordained Bishops, were also invited to participate in the study, 16% of them responded (page 34, footnote).

This book is written by two insiders in the Church of God (Cleveland, TN): Kimberly Ervin Alexander and James P. Bowers. Both of these individuals are people of high academic credentials; they both have Ph.Ds. Alexander is a historical theologian who has in the past served as an assistant vice president for a seminary and is also a past president of the Society for Pentecostal Studies (page 12). Bowers has served as a pastor and seminary vice president (page 12).

The main body of the text consists of seven chapters. The chapters are: Hearing Their Voices, What They Believe About Family, How Power and Leadership Function, Are Women Flourishing as Ministers?, What Women Can Expect in Compensation and Advancement, What A Pentecostal Woman Minister Looks Like, and Looking from the Outside by Cynthia Wooleever. Chapters 2, 3, 4, and 5 each contain two responses to the material presented in the chapter from women ministers in the Church of God. The book also contains three appendixes. The study contained in this book is very detailed; there are a lot of facts and figures some of which are presented in graph and chart form as well.

The fact that the Church of God has 3,088 licensed women ministers in the United States may at first seem to be a very encouraging sign, and in some ways it is. At least the church recognizes that women have God-given ministries and acknowledges these ministries by giving the women ministerial recognition in the form of credentials. However, a closer look shows that these women are definitely not equal with men in ministry. For example, women are “for the most part” not allowed to serve in “state or national positions of authority in the USA” (page 13). In addition, even though they are credentialed ministers they are not allowed to vote in the General Council of the General Assembly (page 13). This means that they do not have a voice in the policies adopted by their denomination. There are also other areas in which they are clearly at a disadvantage; these areas include financial compensation and opportunities for advancement.

The book chronicles the history of the place of women ministers in the Church of God and notes the changes in policy that have taken place regarding them over the years. The results of the study found in this book have produced a profile of what the typical Church of God woman minister looks like, she is: “married, white and middle-aged, politically conservative, college-educated, and is either an evangelist or pastor of a church she founded” (page 122). The study also sets forth some of the reasons why women are not provided with equal opportunity in the denomination, these include biblical understanding and church tradition (pages 130-131). The women respondents feel that the “other reason” they are being restricted is because of “the difficulty that some men have with women in leadership” (page 136). Male respondents said that their objections are based on their understanding of the teachings of the Bible (page 136). Though it is not a major feature of the book, it is clear at certain junctures in the text that there is a sense of hurt and frustration on the part of women about the present position of women ministers in their denomination.

One result of this study that may be a surprise to CBE* readers is that the majority of women ministers who took part in this study hold a traditional view of family, that is, they believe that the man is the priest of the home and the leader in decision-making (page 43). Only 28% of the women believe that “Women and men share equal responsibility and leadership in the home” (page 43).

The authors of this volume are to be commended for giving a voice to the women ministers in their denomination (it is significant that one of the authors is a man and the other is a woman who have partnered together in this book). Both they and the women who participated in this study are also to be commended for not leaving their denomination. Instead, this book has been produced that will hopefully help to bring about change from within. Although the book deals with the struggle for ministerial equality of women in one denomination I suspect that it has relevance for other church bodies as well. May the Lord bless this volume and use it to bring greater equality to women ministers in the Church of God and beyond.

Reviewed by John P. Lathrop

* This review first appeared in the Spring 2014 issue of Priscilla Papers (www.cbeinternational.org). Used with permission.

 

Further Reading:

Interview: “James Bowers and Kimberly Alexander: Leadership and women in Pentecostal ministry” Faith & Leadership (January 27, 2014)

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 Comments

  1. Thanks for the review of a much needed book. I only wish the report was more encouraging. For an ordained woman not to have the vote in denominational decisions is arcane, not to mention wrong.

  2. Thanks for the review of a much needed book. I only wish the report was more encouraging. For an ordained woman not to have the vote in denominational decisions is arcane, not to mention wrong.

  3. does this represent a struggle in the Pentecostal churches between conservatism and liberal progressives? I’m led to believe that the Church of God, Cleveland Tennessee has no such tensions.

    Is this true of other Pentecostal denominations?

  4. does this represent a struggle in the Pentecostal churches between conservatism and liberal progressives? I’m led to believe that the Church of God, Cleveland Tennessee has no such tensions.

    Is this true of other Pentecostal denominations?