The kind of book Evangelical Christians need to be reading on navigating Christian-Muslim relations today is the kind of book Matthew Kaemingk has written in Christian Hospitality and Muslim Immigration in an Age of Fear. So then, I am beginning this review with a positive recommendation right up front. Please let me explain why.
Matthew Kaemingk is assistant professor of Christian ethics and associate dean at Fuller Theological Seminary. Kaemingk earned his Master of Divinity from Princeton Theological Seminary and holds doctoral degrees in Systematic Theology from the Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam and in Christian Ethics from Fuller Theological Seminary. Kaemingk is an ordained minister in the Christian Reformed Church. He presently lives in Houston with his wife Heather and their three sons Calvin, Kees, and Caedmon.
Kaemingk’s research and teaching focus is on Islam and political ethics, faith and the workplace, theology and culture, and Reformed public theology. Thus Christian Hospitality and Muslim Immigration in an Age of Fear comes rather directly out of his primary expertise. And it shows. The Foreword by Jamie Smith, quite the heavy hitter himself and a Charismatic Calvinist on top of that, not only testifies to the credibility of Kaemingk’s work and frames it for readers but helps connect it with Evangelical Reformed readers as well as Pentecostal/Charismatic readers.
Matthew Kaemingk faces several pressing questions head-on. How can diverse people live together? How should Western Christians respond to their new Muslim neighbors? Can Islam and Christianity peacefully coexist? Are there limits to religious freedom and tolerance? How much religious diversity can a single nation withstand? He believes the far left’s unqualified concessions and the far right’s reflex aggressions are both mistaken. Yet he does not simply draw a line down the middle between the two. He proposes another option: “Christian hospitality” or, as he (cover aside) more often puts it, “Christian pluralism”. Yet before prematurely dismissing him at this point readers should note that he does not mean by “pluralism” what may be the first thought which comes to many minds (i.e. he is certainly no John Hick). Kaemingk is firmly committed to the exclusivity of Jesus Christ as the one and only Savior and Lord. He is also firmly committed to loving neighbors—even enemies, if so they be—of other faiths.
How can diverse people live together?
Kaemingk is sure that Christians must respond to the crisis precipitated by the massive increase of Muslim immigration to the West in a specifically Christian manner. He sees theologians such as himself as servants attempting to help facilitate that process. He does not address, important as it is, the question of salvation after death so much as the question of life together before dying. He carefully defines pluralism in terms of culture, structure, and direction in life, and the varied responses Christians can and should make to each. But he does argue for a “Christian pluralist”—one who is personally committed to Christ while being tolerant of and engaged with others—as well suited to navigate the current crises between Christians and Muslims brought on by globalization and immigration.
How should Western Christians respond to their new Muslim neighbors?
The methodology of Christian Hospitality and Muslim Immigration in an Age of Fearis to study the encounter between Christianity and Islam in Europe, particularly in the Netherlands, and then to apply lessons learned as appropriate implications for American Evangelicals and Islam. He chose the Netherlands partly due to their history with Christian-Muslim relations and partly due to his own interest as a Reformed theologian in the influence of Abraham Kuyper on the rise of Christian pluralism. For Kaemingk, Kuyper provides a resource for combating hegemony and uniformity while constructing a theology of pluralism nevertheless remaining faithfully Christocentric, even Evangelical.
I will offer three observations. First, this is a very Reformed book. That’s not meant as a criticism, merely a description. It will be both a plus and a minus for readers. For Reformed folks this is an excellent model of a constructive, positive approach for theological underpinnings to Christian-Muslim relations. For non-Reformed folks (such as me) a lot of the categories and constructs can seem kind of strange (e.g. “spatial sovereignty” or “sphere sovereignty”). Yet most of us can recognize it as a valiant attempt within its own tradition to accomplish a much-needed task. And all of us can learn from it.
Are there limits to religious freedom and tolerance?
Second, as a Pentecostal believer I find the pneumatological lacunae lamentable. True enough, Kaemingk acknowledges that any effectiveness in achieving combating hegemony and accomplishing interfaith cooperation will be ultimately due to “the gracious work of the Holy Spirit” (p. 150). But that is a rare remark. Sadly, the rich potential of the dramatic diversity of Pentecost is missing. Rather, the work of the Holy Spirit is only briefly presented through the lens of the Reformed doctrine of “common grace” which, despite Kaemingk’s efforts, is not energetic or robust.
Are both of these wrong? The far left’s unqualified concessions to Muslims and the far right’s reflexive aggressions.
Third, I fear Kaemingk’s vigorous effort to retrieve the category of pluralism for an Evangelical audience may be doomed from the start. Although I am sympathetic to his objective, and have even occasionally employed it myself, the language is probably so negatively loaded emotively that few will feel comfortable with it. Hospitality is a better term. It has positive associations and can carry the load biblically and theologically. Yet Kaemingk, though using it, and even including it in the main title of the book, in practice employs Christian pluralism much more than Christian hospitality. This is probably because of his reliance on Kuyper. More importantly, I get a sense that he would have us understand hospitality and pluralism, at least of the type he espouses, as close cousins—if not actually synonymous. If so, that’s not a bad idea. Nevertheless, I am reminded of the unsuccessful attempt of early church father Clement of Alexandria to retrieve the notorious category and terminology of Gnosticism, which, in his opinion, had been hijacked by heretics, by carefully defining and qualifying it in accordance with orthodoxy. In any case, Kaemingk’s strident theological and ethical arguments against hegemony and uniformity, which are really at the heart of this work, are insightful and to be taken seriously. They sound a warning worth hearing well.
Christian theology can and should serve as a resource for Christians in creating a gracious and welcoming space for religious diversity in society while staunchly maintaining the firmest commitment to the exclusivity of Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord.
Briefly, note that Christian Hospitality and Muslim Immigration in an Age of Fearis to an extent a political theology for the public square but not overtly partisan. However, although it is about responding to the interreligious realities of immigration it is not necessarily concerned with advocating for this or that particular immigration policy. It is more about dealing with the reality on the ground, so to speak, from a theological perspective. My sense is that globalists and nationalists, liberals and conservatives will find in it qualities with which they agree and disagree. Perhaps all will be challenged and stimulated.
With all of that being said, I repeat: the kind of book Evangelical (and other) Christians (Reformed or not) need to be reading on Christian-Muslim relations today is the kind of book Matthew Kaemingk has written in Christian Hospitality and Muslim Immigration in an Age of Fear. I highly recommend it. Quibbles aside, I could not agree more with what I take to be the main thrust of this engaging and well written monograph. That is to say, that Christian theology can and should serve as a resource for Christians in creating a gracious and welcoming space for religious diversity in society while staunchly maintaining the firmest commitment to the exclusivity of Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord. That may sound like an almost impossible task; however, Matthew Kaemingk does an exceptional job of doing just that.
Tony Richie, D.Min, Ph.D., is missionary teacher at SEMISUD (Quito, Ecuador) and adjunct professor at the Pentecostal Theological Seminary (Cleveland, TN). Dr. Richie is an Ordained Bishop in the Church of God, and Senior Pastor at New Harvest in Knoxville, TN. He has served the Society for Pentecostal Studies as Ecumenical Studies Interest Group Leader and is currently Liaison to the Interfaith Relations Commission of the National Council of Churches (USA), and represents Pentecostals with Interreligious Dialogue and Cooperation of the World Council of Churches and the Commission of the Churches on International Affairs. He is the author of Speaking by the Spirit: A Pentecostal Model for Interreligious Dialogue (Emeth Press, 2011) and Toward a Pentecostal Theology of Religions: Encountering Cornelius Today (CPT Press, 2013) as well as several journal articles and books chapters on Pentecostal theology and experience.
Dear Brothers and Sisters, Normally I send out my own prayer requests once a year (and some of them DO still need prayer) but this one is kind of urgent. Most of you know I spent five months over three summers ministering in the Middle Belt of Nigeria. For years, Christians have been periodically slaughtered…
Daniel Harrell, “The 30-Day Leviticus Challenge: One church’s experiment in living the most arcane book of the Bible” Christianity Today (August 2008), pages 30-33. Many years ago I had the rich experience of visiting the historic Park Street Congregational Church in Boston, Massachusetts. I was amazed to sit in one of America’s early churches…
A guest review by Evangelist David Hernandez. Dallas Willard, Hearing God: Developing a Conversational Relationship with God (InterVarsity Press, 1999 and 2012) 304 pages, ISBN 9780830835690. Many Christian leaders will agree with the saying that prayer is a two-way conversation with God, yet very few have ever experienced this type of relationship with our Lord….
Mark A. Tietjen, Kierkegaard: A Christian Missionary to Christians (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2016), 169 pages, ISBN 9780830840977. An article in the August/September 2016 issue of Philosophy Now asks, “Is Kierkegaard Still Relevant Today?”[1] Author Mark A. Tietjen, who teaches at the Stony Brook School in New York and is the author of Kierkegaard,…
Michael L. Brown, Jezebel’s War With America: The Plot to Destroy Our Country and What We Can Do to Turn the Tide (Lake Mary, FL: Frontline, 2019), 256 pages, ISBN 9781629996660. Dr. Michael Brown is a well-known figure in Pentecostal/Charismatic circles. He travels the world preaching, is the host of the Line of Fire program,…
After the Beatitudes (Matthew 5:3-10), there does not appear to be any break in the chronology of Matthew’s narrative. It seems that Yeshua1 (Jesus) continues teaching on this mountain in Galilee (see Matt. 7:28-29). There is however, a break in the context. If the assertions made in the last edition of the Pneuma Review were…